BLACK MAGIC SPELLS 2006

Black magic is often seen as the
branch of magic used to perform evil acts or draw on malevolent powers. Many
believe black magic is usually invoked to kill, injure, cause destruction, or
for personal gain. Black magic is normally a term used to describe a form of
ritual that is not approved of by a group or person, however not everything
named black magic is truly being done by the practitioner with malevolent
intentions. Most using this meaning for black magic are not practicing the magic
they are describing. In the Inquisition, Christians were afraid of witches and
warlocks practicing evil black magic. In modern times, witches and warlocks will
use the term to describe the bad magic they do not do in contrast with the good
white magic they do practice.
The differences
between black magic and white magic are debated, and several theories that
compare and contrast the two branches include the All as One theory, the No
Connection theory, and the Separate but Equal theory.
All as One: All forms of magic are evil, or black, magic. The religions that
maintain this opinion include most branches of Christianity, Islam, Judaism,
Buddhism and Hinduism. This view generally associates black magic with Satanism.
Ironically, some people on the left-hand path would agree that all magic is the
same. The belief would not be that all magic is evil, but rather that morality
is in the eyes of the beholder. Unlike more orthodox religions, these people
believe that all magic can have good and bad consequences. The interpretation of
what is good and bad is thought to change for each person instead of the type of
magic.
No Connection: Black and white magic are both forms of magic, but are completely
different from the base up, and are accomplished differently, even if achieving
similar effects. This stance is the one most often presented in fiction,
including the Harry Potter series, at least in part.
Separate but Equal: Black and white magic are exactly the same thing,
differentiated only by their end goals. Under this belief, the same spell could
be either white or black; it is determined by the end result. The majority of
religions follow this belief, as does the remainder of fiction that does not
follow the No Connection theory.
Prayer in black magic is passivity and destruction, in an
attitude of humiliation and worship. Prayer in
white magic is work and creation, in an attitude of determination and respect.
The disciple of black magic does evil with the hope that some good will emerge
out of it through a miraculous violation of the laws of nature. The disciple of
white magic does good by consenting to an effort appraised as the least evil
according to the laws of nature. Priests of black magic invoke authority as the
source of knowledge, and claim that the ways of their gods are unfathomable to
anyone but them. Priests of white magic propose conjectures that are subject to
the open review of everyone's reason and experience, and gaining insight into
their divinities is the very essence of their religious practice. Priests of
black magic extend their cult by subjecting the infidels to their creed, by
humiliating and degrading other people. Priests of white magic extend their
religion by subjecting their beliefs to the criticism of other people, by
freeing and bettering themselves. Believers of black magic are the slaves of
their gods. Believers of white magic are the masters of their gods.
Black magic and white magic coexist in traditional and instituted religions.
They are two opposite poles of behaviour between which are each of our acts.
Black magic always wins in appearance3; you will always see it dominate the
established institutions, glorified by formal rites and astonishing shows. But
it is white magic that actually makes the world go round, even if it requires
discernment to see that; it is white magic that continuously adapts to the
world, from which stems all creation, that serves as the basis for civilization
itself.
There is an opposition between Good and Evil, but it is not the cosmic struggle
proposed by the priests of the cult of the dead; it is not a conflict between
superior gods, where Good would be to submit to the god of one priest rather
than to other gods. On the contrary, it is the opposition between on the one
hand a culture of destruction, of humiliation and of spectacle, and on the other
hand, a culture of creation, pride and work.
|


|
|